October 7, 2025
1157a680-6d21-11ef-b970-9f202720b57a.jpg
Spread the love

Standing on organize clutching a bouquet of blooms, 24-year-old MBA understudy Manshika Prasad had fair been delegated Miss Fiji.But before long after, concurring to one of the judges, things at the excellence show “turned truly ugly”.Ugly is possibly an modest representation of the truth: what unfurled over the another few days would see excellence rulers delegated and unseated, wild affirmations tossed around and in the long run the rise of a shadowy figure with a exceptionally individual association to one of the contestants.

Ms Prasad to begin with found out something was off-base two days after her win, when Miss Universe Fiji (MUF) issued a press discharge. It said a “serious breach of principles” had happened, and “revised results” would be made open shortly.A couple of hours afterward, Ms Prasad was told she wouldn’t be voyaging to Mexico to compete for the Miss Universe title in November.Instead, runner-up Nadine Roberts, a 30-year-old show and property engineer from Sydney, whose mother is Fijian, would take her place.

Instead, runner-up Nadine Roberts, a 30-year-old show and property engineer from Sydney, whose mother is Fijian, would take her place.The press discharge affirmed the “adjust methods” had not been taken after, and that Ms Prasad had been chosen in a fixed vote which favored a “Fiji Indian” contender to win since it would bring budgetary benefits to the event’s manager.

A troubled Ms Prasad issued a explanation saying she would be taking a break from social media, but cautioned that there was “so much the open did not know about”.The modern ruler, in the interim, advertised a message of bolster. “We are all affected by this,” Ms Roberts composed on Instagram, some time recently saying thanks to Miss Universe Fiji for its “swift action”.The modern ruler, in the interim, advertised a message of bolster. “We are all affected by this,” Ms Roberts composed on Instagram, some time recently saying thanks to Miss Universe Fiji for its “swift action”.But those who took portion in the challenge were not fulfilled: there were as well numerous things that didn’t include up.

But as the newly-crowned Miss Universe Fiji stood on arrange, radiating in her shining tiara, the judges detected something was wrong.To her right, Nadine Roberts – wearing her runners-up band – was “fuming”, charges Ms Chan.To her right, Nadine Roberts – wearing her runners-up band – was “fuming”, charges Ms Chan.“I keep in mind going to bed considering, how seem somebody feel so entitled to win?

To her right, Nadine Roberts – wearing her runners-up band fuming :

“I keep in mind going to bed considering, how seem somebody feel so entitled to win?You win a few, you lose a few. She’s a prepared excellence show contender – unquestionably she knew that.The another day, Ms Prasad took a celebratory vessel trip with the judges.The another day, Ms Prasad took a celebratory vessel trip with the judges.“She was fair in wonder, saying: my life will be changed now,” says Ms Chan.e was fair in wonder, saying: my life will be changed now,” says Ms Chan.

But there had still been no official affirmation of Ms Prasad’s victory.Not as it were this – one of the judges was obviously missing from the trip: Riri Febriani, who was speaking to Lux Ventures, the company that bought the permit to hold Miss Universe in Fiji.“I keep in mind considering that was odd,” says Ms White, who shared a room with Ms Febriani. “But she fair said she had parts of work to do and she required to conversation to her boss.”Ms Febriani says she didn’t go on the watercraft trip as she required to rest – and there’s no way the others would know who she was informing on her phone.Ms Febriani says she didn’t go on the watercraft trip as she required to rest – and there’s no way the others would know who she was informing on her phone. But Ms White says she worked out her flat mate was handling calls and writings from a man called “Jamie.Miss Universe is a multi-million-dollar trade which works like a establishment – you require to purchase a permit which empowers you to utilize the brand and offer tickets for the event.

Those licenses are costly and in little nations it’s difficult to discover anybody willing to finance a national exhibition – which is why Fiji hasn’t entered a contender since 1981.But this year, one association was willing to purchase the permit: property advancement firm Lux Projects.Ms Febriani was its agent on the judging board, but too looked after media communications“I’d got on so well with her, she appeared a exceptionally sweet person,” says. Ms White“But that day when she didn’t come on the watercraft, her mien kind of changed. She fair kept saying she was super active with work, continuously on the phone with this. Jamie’ guyIt turned out that, in spite of having Ms Febriani on the board, Lux Ventures was not cheerful with the result of the voteIt turned out that, in spite of having. Ms Febriani on the board., Lux Ventures was not cheerful with the result of the vote.

Its press discharge on Sunday said the licensee itself ought to moreover get a vote – one which the contracted coordinator, Give Dwyer, had “failed to count”Lux Ventures would have voted for Ms Roberts, bringing the comes about to a 4-4 tie..What’s more, it said, the licensee moreover had the “determining vote” – making Ms Roberts the winner.“Never at any point were we told almost an eighth judge or any kind of non-attendant judge,” says Ms Chan.Never at any point were we told almost an eighth judge or any kind of non-attendant judge,” says Ms Chan.It wasn’t on the site, it wasn’t anyplace. Other than, how can you vote on a challenge if you’re not indeed there?

Ms White was too suspicious:

“Never at any point were we told almost an eighth judge or any kind of non-attendant judge,” says Ms Chan.“It wasn’t on the site, it wasn’t anyplace. Other than, how can you vote on a challenge if you’re not indeed there?“I did a few burrowing and it turns out that Lux Ventures was closely related with an Australian businessman called Jamie McIntyre,” says Ms White.And Jamie McIntyre,” she told the BBC, “is hitched to Nadine Roberts.

Mr McIntyre portrays himself as an business person, financial specialist and “world-leading teacher”, who has – concurring to data accessible online – been hitched to Ms Roberts since 2022.

He was moreover prohibited from doing trade in Australia for a decade in 2016 due to his inclusion in a property venture plot that misplaced financial specialists more than A$7m ($4.7m; £3.6m). The judge in the case said there was “no prove to recommend that fruitful change is likely”.

A representative who addressed him as portion of a parliamentary committee hearing afterward depicted him as “the most sly witness I have had to bargain with – and that’s saying something”, agreeing to the Sydney Morning Herald.

But what was he doing here?

“[Mr McIntyre] isn’t a chief or shareholder of the MUF licensee company, but has acted as an counsel, as he is a shareholder in related companies,” Jamie McIntyre’s agents told the BBC.

However, the company’s Instagram page does include a video of Mr McIntyre giving property venture exhortation, as well as a interface to 21st Century College, a Bali-based property company claimed by Mr McIntyre.

The BBC moreover gets it that a “Jamie” was on the line amid phone calls between Ms Roberts and the occasion coordinator, Give Dwyer.

Mr McIntyre’s agents demand that charges that he was included in the judging discussion are a “conspiracy theory” – in spite of the fact that they did acquiesce that he had “provided counsel to the permit holder”.

Additionally, the press release’s charge that Mr Dwyer had influenced the board to select Ms Prasad since of her race is undermined by the truth that Mr Dwyer is caught on to have voted for Ms Roberts.

Getty Pictures A man in a light coloured suit stands in front of a podium conveying a discourse into a amplifier. He too shows up extended on the enormous screen behind him.Getty Images

Jamie McIntyre was prohibited from doing trade in Australia for 10 a long time for his association in false property venture schemes

“It’s fair net to indeed bring up race,” says Ms Chan. “It was never, ever once expressed among any of the judges,” she adds.

The BBC has looked for comment from both Ms Roberts and Ms Prasad, but not one or the other has responded.

Several of those included – counting a few judges and hopefuls – have been sent “cease and desist” emails by Lux Ventures, the BBC gets it, which have been taken as commensurate to choking orders by the recipients.

Prestige, wonderfulness – and money

This outrage in Fiji is by no implies the to begin with to hit the world of magnificence exhibitions, which verifiably has seen its reasonable share of controversies.

“Pageants are full of dramatization, of discussions, of individuals saying the challenge was a fix,” says Prof Hilary Levey Friedman, creator of ‘Here She Is: The Complicated Rule of the Excellence Show in America.’

“But I will say that in more later a long time, these issues have gotten to be much more articulated much obliged to social media,” she adds.

Apart from a voting embarrassment at the Miss America challenge in 2022, later discussions have tended to be in less created parts of the world.

This is likely since they tend to be non-profit undertakings in numerous Western nations, concurring to Prof Friedman, whereas exhibitions somewhere else have ended up more well known and more profitable than ever.

“Historically, excellence shows have been an astonishing apparatus for social versatility for women,” says Prof Friedman.

“Apart from the glory and the wonderfulness, it gives you a stage to pull in supporters and sponsorships. When there’s cash included, the stakes are higher.”

For Ms Prasad in spite of the fact that, it turns out there is a upbeat ending.

On Friday, she posted on one of her social media accounts that she had in fact been re-crowned as Miss Fiji 2024.

“What an mind blowing travel this has been,” she composed on Instagram.

Miss Universe Organization (MUO) has not reacted to a ask for comment, but the BBC gets it it is amazingly troubled with the occasions in Fiji and, after having set up the truths, worked difficult to restore Ms Prasad as the island’s queen.

For Ms Prasad there is joy. For the judges, relief.

As for Ms Roberts, she is calling herself the “real Miss Universe Fiji 2024” on Instagram.

Judge Ms White says she’s “so glad of how Manshika [Prasad] has conducted herself all through this travel. She’s a brilliant, compassionate, and wonderful youthful lady, who didn’t merit this.

“We fair needed the truth to come out and presently it has.”


Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *